<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for alainsaffel.com</title>
	<atom:link href="http://alainsaffel.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://alainsaffel.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Mar 2010 16:09:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Should Edmonton close the Edmonton City Centre Airport? by Jeff</title>
		<link>http://alainsaffel.com/edmonton-city-centre-airport-ecca/comment-page-1/#comment-2368</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Mar 2010 16:09:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alainsaffel.com/?p=600#comment-2368</guid>
		<description>Why not move the city center airport to say like north part of the city or another part where building are not as tall the city can buy more land, with the alberta having a high ecno. sometime or other the city limits will have to expand and i know theres not tall building all over edmonton say like clearview area, or like said buy some land jusr right outside the city say like in the middle of edmonton and st.albert, and have the airport for people that go to work on the rigs or have to go northren alberta or the NWT like it is now and have the Main airport for normal passangers goin to say China or some orther country, and what happens to the nascar race in the summer i&#039;m sure the city makes money from that as well, you move the ECCA to a diff area then the city can still make money for inprovements from that and new buildings in it&#039;s place for more jobs and thats what&#039;s need is more jobs, thus making everyone happy eg. jobs money, nascar races. and then the ECCA staff will not have to lose there jobs. but thats just my thoughts</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why not move the city center airport to say like north part of the city or another part where building are not as tall the city can buy more land, with the alberta having a high ecno. sometime or other the city limits will have to expand and i know theres not tall building all over edmonton say like clearview area, or like said buy some land jusr right outside the city say like in the middle of edmonton and st.albert, and have the airport for people that go to work on the rigs or have to go northren alberta or the NWT like it is now and have the Main airport for normal passangers goin to say China or some orther country, and what happens to the nascar race in the summer i&#8217;m sure the city makes money from that as well, you move the ECCA to a diff area then the city can still make money for inprovements from that and new buildings in it&#8217;s place for more jobs and thats what&#8217;s need is more jobs, thus making everyone happy eg. jobs money, nascar races. and then the ECCA staff will not have to lose there jobs. but thats just my thoughts</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Canada&#8217;s Olympic medal count: a solution by Alain Saffel</title>
		<link>http://alainsaffel.com/canada-olympic-medal-count/comment-page-1/#comment-2364</link>
		<dc:creator>Alain Saffel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 20:50:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alainsaffel.com/?p=846#comment-2364</guid>
		<description>I come up with as many thoughts and advices as I possibly can. I hope you&#039;ll continue to read my topic. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I come up with as many thoughts and advices as I possibly can. I hope you&#8217;ll continue to read my topic. <img src='http://alainsaffel.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Canada&#8217;s Olympic medal count: a solution by From a spammer</title>
		<link>http://alainsaffel.com/canada-olympic-medal-count/comment-page-1/#comment-2360</link>
		<dc:creator>From a spammer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 01:59:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alainsaffel.com/?p=846#comment-2360</guid>
		<description>Valuable thoughts and advices. I read your topic with great interest.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Valuable thoughts and advices. I read your topic with great interest.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Thoughts on the Alberta Party &amp; Alberta politics by How much will the Alberta Party hear? &#8211; Community Intelligence</title>
		<link>http://alainsaffel.com/alberta-party/comment-page-1/#comment-2358</link>
		<dc:creator>How much will the Alberta Party hear? &#8211; Community Intelligence</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 20:42:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alainsaffel.com/?p=834#comment-2358</guid>
		<description>[...] Alain Saffel   Share and Enjoy: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Alain Saffel   Share and Enjoy: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Thoughts on the Alberta Party &amp; Alberta politics by Alain Saffel</title>
		<link>http://alainsaffel.com/alberta-party/comment-page-1/#comment-2357</link>
		<dc:creator>Alain Saffel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 17:58:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alainsaffel.com/?p=834#comment-2357</guid>
		<description>Colin, it&#039;s not just progressives who feel governments aren&#039;t listening to them. It&#039;s across the political spectrum. We need governments that not only listen, but actually act on the concerns  and wishes of citizens.

I&#039;m sure people from across the political spectrum are pissed off because of governments trying to ram new powerlines down their throats to the tune of $20 billion and they have no say in the matter. We&#039;re not going to debate that?

Or maybe the Alberta government will close down something like Alberta Hospital, while claiming that these people will be taken care of in the community. We know damn well what happens in these situations because it happened in the 80s &amp; 90s. Costs are &quot;externalized.&quot; Alberta citizens are the ones who&#039;ll pay the price in crime and misery, not to mention increased insurance costs.

It&#039;s no problem to hand out $2 billion to private companies for carbon capture and storage, but they can&#039;t spend a few million on an institution like Alberta Hospital?

We need governments who have the vision to see the correct course of action because it&#039;s the best thing for Albertans. I don&#039;t care if it conflicts with their ideology or if provincial lobbyists don&#039;t agree. That&#039;s not what we have now.

As for policy, I would disagree that citizens aren&#039;t concerned about policy. What seems to continue to happen federally and provincially is that we elect governments that initially seem to reflect the sensibilities of citizens, but then the hidden agenda starts. 

I would really like to see a government that has a real plan and doesn&#039;t fly by the seat of its pants. Alberta governments seem to govern more like pinball machines, bouncing from one issue to the next.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Colin, it&#8217;s not just progressives who feel governments aren&#8217;t listening to them. It&#8217;s across the political spectrum. We need governments that not only listen, but actually act on the concerns  and wishes of citizens.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m sure people from across the political spectrum are pissed off because of governments trying to ram new powerlines down their throats to the tune of $20 billion and they have no say in the matter. We&#8217;re not going to debate that?</p>
<p>Or maybe the Alberta government will close down something like Alberta Hospital, while claiming that these people will be taken care of in the community. We know damn well what happens in these situations because it happened in the 80s &amp; 90s. Costs are &#8220;externalized.&#8221; Alberta citizens are the ones who&#8217;ll pay the price in crime and misery, not to mention increased insurance costs.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s no problem to hand out $2 billion to private companies for carbon capture and storage, but they can&#8217;t spend a few million on an institution like Alberta Hospital?</p>
<p>We need governments who have the vision to see the correct course of action because it&#8217;s the best thing for Albertans. I don&#8217;t care if it conflicts with their ideology or if provincial lobbyists don&#8217;t agree. That&#8217;s not what we have now.</p>
<p>As for policy, I would disagree that citizens aren&#8217;t concerned about policy. What seems to continue to happen federally and provincially is that we elect governments that initially seem to reflect the sensibilities of citizens, but then the hidden agenda starts. </p>
<p>I would really like to see a government that has a real plan and doesn&#8217;t fly by the seat of its pants. Alberta governments seem to govern more like pinball machines, bouncing from one issue to the next.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Thoughts on the Alberta Party &amp; Alberta politics by Colin</title>
		<link>http://alainsaffel.com/alberta-party/comment-page-1/#comment-2356</link>
		<dc:creator>Colin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 16:46:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alainsaffel.com/?p=834#comment-2356</guid>
		<description>I hate to be Mr. Obvious but,

Is it really surprising that progressives do not feel that a conservative gov&#039;t is not listening to them?

Again, what is the overall strategy?  What is the end game?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hate to be Mr. Obvious but,</p>
<p>Is it really surprising that progressives do not feel that a conservative gov&#8217;t is not listening to them?</p>
<p>Again, what is the overall strategy?  What is the end game?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Thoughts on the Alberta Party &amp; Alberta politics by Ken Chapman</title>
		<link>http://alainsaffel.com/alberta-party/comment-page-1/#comment-2354</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken Chapman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 06:12:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alainsaffel.com/?p=834#comment-2354</guid>
		<description>The Citizen&#039;s Values conjoint survey Reboot Alberta just did amongst progressives in Alberta showed overwhelmingly that they do not feel that governments are listening to people nor do the opinions of citiznes have much sway in the power and policy making in the province.

Listening means conversations which leads to better understanding and respect and information about what is bothering people and what they see as needing policy attention.

I will be doing a blog post on some of the survey results before Reboot2.0 and a major presentation on the results and some analysis of the political and governance implications for the province at Reboot2.0</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Citizen&#8217;s Values conjoint survey Reboot Alberta just did amongst progressives in Alberta showed overwhelmingly that they do not feel that governments are listening to people nor do the opinions of citiznes have much sway in the power and policy making in the province.</p>
<p>Listening means conversations which leads to better understanding and respect and information about what is bothering people and what they see as needing policy attention.</p>
<p>I will be doing a blog post on some of the survey results before Reboot2.0 and a major presentation on the results and some analysis of the political and governance implications for the province at Reboot2.0</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Thoughts on the Alberta Party &amp; Alberta politics by Ken Chapman</title>
		<link>http://alainsaffel.com/alberta-party/comment-page-1/#comment-2353</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken Chapman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 06:06:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alainsaffel.com/?p=834#comment-2353</guid>
		<description>You can follow Reboot2.0 on Twitter using #rebootab and also leave comments on www.rebootalberta.org.  We are runing the Twitter scroll for #rebootab live on a screen at Reboot2.0.  Lots of Twitterati and Bloggers coming to Reboot2.0 so expect lots of interactive online participation just like at Reboot&#039;s launch</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can follow Reboot2.0 on Twitter using #rebootab and also leave comments on <a href="http://www.rebootalberta.org" rel="nofollow">http://www.rebootalberta.org</a>.  We are runing the Twitter scroll for #rebootab live on a screen at Reboot2.0.  Lots of Twitterati and Bloggers coming to Reboot2.0 so expect lots of interactive online participation just like at Reboot&#8217;s launch</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Thoughts on the Alberta Party &amp; Alberta politics by Colin</title>
		<link>http://alainsaffel.com/alberta-party/comment-page-1/#comment-2352</link>
		<dc:creator>Colin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 02:16:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alainsaffel.com/?p=834#comment-2352</guid>
		<description>I hear what you are saying, however, I think we are both making assumptions about what citizens want.  Of course, citizens want politicians to listen, but I do not think the lack of listening is the impetus to take action for change.

When citizens sense injustice, I believe that is their driver.  Not that a politician is not listening.

Therecent happenings in the US is a great example.  After eight years of Bush, Americans came to a decision that significant change was needed.  Obama was clearly speaking what people wanted and bet that his message would resonate.  The key was that he had always been listening and translated it into action via means for citizens to get involved.  Listening was not a campaign or some unique activity, it was something he just did and he did not need to make a big deal of the fact he listens.

The other key was that the public wanted to hear a different voice.  Clearly Alberta wants the same with the rise of the WAP.

Another concern is that the people involved in Renew and the Alberta Party are right now disenfranchised with their previous parties.  So they seem to me to be insiders and may not be as connected to the 60% of Albertans who did not vote.  They may want to be, but parties have a tendancy to create bubbles around members, the so called &#039;drinkng the kool-aid&#039; effect.  My sense is that this heavy emphasis on citizen engagement for the sake of engagement is becoming the kool-aid and i do not believe that is what people are looking for.

I think any electorate can be expanded, but it requires a different approach, by first building a different and open party.  I&#039;m not sure that the Alberta Party has positioned itself in that manner.

I also think that people care far less about policy per se, but that the actions and character of leaders reflect their sensibilities.  If those are event, then I think policy matters more.

Anyways, good discussion.  Hope I&#039;ve pulled my head out of my ass  :-P</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hear what you are saying, however, I think we are both making assumptions about what citizens want.  Of course, citizens want politicians to listen, but I do not think the lack of listening is the impetus to take action for change.</p>
<p>When citizens sense injustice, I believe that is their driver.  Not that a politician is not listening.</p>
<p>Therecent happenings in the US is a great example.  After eight years of Bush, Americans came to a decision that significant change was needed.  Obama was clearly speaking what people wanted and bet that his message would resonate.  The key was that he had always been listening and translated it into action via means for citizens to get involved.  Listening was not a campaign or some unique activity, it was something he just did and he did not need to make a big deal of the fact he listens.</p>
<p>The other key was that the public wanted to hear a different voice.  Clearly Alberta wants the same with the rise of the WAP.</p>
<p>Another concern is that the people involved in Renew and the Alberta Party are right now disenfranchised with their previous parties.  So they seem to me to be insiders and may not be as connected to the 60% of Albertans who did not vote.  They may want to be, but parties have a tendancy to create bubbles around members, the so called &#8216;drinkng the kool-aid&#8217; effect.  My sense is that this heavy emphasis on citizen engagement for the sake of engagement is becoming the kool-aid and i do not believe that is what people are looking for.</p>
<p>I think any electorate can be expanded, but it requires a different approach, by first building a different and open party.  I&#8217;m not sure that the Alberta Party has positioned itself in that manner.</p>
<p>I also think that people care far less about policy per se, but that the actions and character of leaders reflect their sensibilities.  If those are event, then I think policy matters more.</p>
<p>Anyways, good discussion.  Hope I&#8217;ve pulled my head out of my ass  <img src='http://alainsaffel.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':-P' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Thoughts on the Alberta Party &amp; Alberta politics by Alain Saffel</title>
		<link>http://alainsaffel.com/alberta-party/comment-page-1/#comment-2351</link>
		<dc:creator>Alain Saffel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 02:02:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alainsaffel.com/?p=834#comment-2351</guid>
		<description>Hi Jane,

Thanks for coming back and making a few things clear.

I agree with you that all party related expenditures should be fully transparent. It would be one step towards full accountability. I just don&#039;t understand why some people have a problem with that. I don&#039;t need to see personal financial details, of course.

(I think I need a button that will allow people to be notified via email of responses. Must be a widget for that!)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Jane,</p>
<p>Thanks for coming back and making a few things clear.</p>
<p>I agree with you that all party related expenditures should be fully transparent. It would be one step towards full accountability. I just don&#8217;t understand why some people have a problem with that. I don&#8217;t need to see personal financial details, of course.</p>
<p>(I think I need a button that will allow people to be notified via email of responses. Must be a widget for that!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
